<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for MasurLaw</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.masurlaw.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.masurlaw.com</link>
	<description>Technology Law Firm New York &#124; Entertainment Law Firm New York</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:09:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Summary of SOPA and PIPA by The SOPA/ACTA and the Future of K-pop&#160;&#124;&#160;seoulbeats</title>
		<link>http://www.masurlaw.com/projects/summary-of-sopa-and-pipa/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>The SOPA/ACTA and the Future of K-pop&#160;&#124;&#160;seoulbeats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masurlaw.com/?page_id=5546#comment-372</guid>
		<description>[...] and major corporations. Here are some consequences of the bill had it come to pass (and more here and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and major corporations. Here are some consequences of the bill had it come to pass (and more here and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Summary of ACTA by [不看條文的] 臺灣高層 愛戀 [侵權更甚於 SOPA 與 ACTA 的] TPP? &#171; 學生族偵探事務所</title>
		<link>http://www.masurlaw.com/5639/summary-of-acta/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>[不看條文的] 臺灣高層 愛戀 [侵權更甚於 SOPA 與 ACTA 的] TPP? &#171; 學生族偵探事務所</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masurlaw.com/?p=5639#comment-369</guid>
		<description>[...] 經過許多抗議及維基解密的爆料, 美國終於勉強公告一份摘要。 請見  法律事務所的白話摘要。 ACTA 除了把  「翻譯檔案格式? 有罪!」 的 DRM 進一步提升到  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 經過許多抗議及維基解密的爆料, 美國終於勉強公告一份摘要。 請見  法律事務所的白話摘要。 ACTA 除了把  「翻譯檔案格式? 有罪!」 的 DRM 進一步提升到  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Summary of SOPA and PIPA by What’s all the fuss about the US SOPA/PIPA bills? &#171; copyrightagency</title>
		<link>http://www.masurlaw.com/projects/summary-of-sopa-and-pipa/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>What’s all the fuss about the US SOPA/PIPA bills? &#171; copyrightagency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masurlaw.com/?page_id=5546#comment-360</guid>
		<description>[...] There is a useful summary of each bill (as at 20 January), the criticisms of the bills and the counter-arguments here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There is a useful summary of each bill (as at 20 January), the criticisms of the bills and the counter-arguments here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Summary of SOPA and PIPA by SOPA e PIPA são apenas o início do cerco à liberdade na Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.masurlaw.com/projects/summary-of-sopa-and-pipa/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>SOPA e PIPA são apenas o início do cerco à liberdade na Internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 04:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masurlaw.com/?page_id=5546#comment-358</guid>
		<description>[...] algum projeto de lei que facilite o combate à pirataria. Pode ser, inclusive, que a proposta SOPA e sua irmã PIPA sejam bodes na esfera pública: cria-se um projeto de lei ridículo e absurdo, mas esse projeto [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] algum projeto de lei que facilite o combate à pirataria. Pode ser, inclusive, que a proposta SOPA e sua irmã PIPA sejam bodes na esfera pública: cria-se um projeto de lei ridículo e absurdo, mas esse projeto [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What’s the Point of New York’s LLC Publication Requirement? by Donna</title>
		<link>http://www.masurlaw.com/1182/new-york-llc-publication-requirement/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masurlaw.com/?p=1182#comment-353</guid>
		<description>What if an LLC did not publish within the 120 days....can it still publish?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if an LLC did not publish within the 120 days&#8230;.can it still publish?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What’s the Point of New York’s LLC Publication Requirement? by Mike Akerly</title>
		<link>http://www.masurlaw.com/1182/new-york-llc-publication-requirement/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Akerly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masurlaw.com/?p=1182#comment-352</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be curious what anyone reading this thinks of the below option that&#039;s being floating by at least one NY company.  I have nothing to do with this firm except that I&#039;m considering using them, and I haven&#039;t provided their name as I&#039;m not trying to plug them on this blog.  Thoughts?

&quot;A lot of businesses in New York City will file the initial information with our Albany registered agent office listed as the Principal office address on paper, and then file an amendment for $60.00 or a certificate of change for $30.00 with the New York Department of State, changing to their New York City office address after the publication is completed. There is nothing in the Statute as of 9-1-2010 requiring anyone to re-publish if a change to any information was made.  For those of you not wanting to pay a New York City newspaper 1000.00 to get your business started, you can hire our firm as your registered agent for $125.00. Then pay the Albany County newspapers roughly $100.00 to publish. Then 6 months from now, pay the State an additional $30.00 to file the certificate of change.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be curious what anyone reading this thinks of the below option that&#8217;s being floating by at least one NY company.  I have nothing to do with this firm except that I&#8217;m considering using them, and I haven&#8217;t provided their name as I&#8217;m not trying to plug them on this blog.  Thoughts?</p>
<p>&#8220;A lot of businesses in New York City will file the initial information with our Albany registered agent office listed as the Principal office address on paper, and then file an amendment for $60.00 or a certificate of change for $30.00 with the New York Department of State, changing to their New York City office address after the publication is completed. There is nothing in the Statute as of 9-1-2010 requiring anyone to re-publish if a change to any information was made.  For those of you not wanting to pay a New York City newspaper 1000.00 to get your business started, you can hire our firm as your registered agent for $125.00. Then pay the Albany County newspapers roughly $100.00 to publish. Then 6 months from now, pay the State an additional $30.00 to file the certificate of change.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Songs and Records: Two Types of Music Copyrights? by masurlaw</title>
		<link>http://www.masurlaw.com/3980/songs-and-records-two-types-of-music-copyrights/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>masurlaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 19:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masurlaw.com/?p=3980#comment-350</guid>
		<description>Hi Shaun,
We can definitely help you with this. 
Feel free to shoot us an email at info@masurlaw.com
Thanks for reading!
MasurLaw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Shaun,<br />
We can definitely help you with this.<br />
Feel free to shoot us an email at <a href="mailto:info@masurlaw.com">info@masurlaw.com</a><br />
Thanks for reading!<br />
MasurLaw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Songs and Records: Two Types of Music Copyrights? by shaun bonilla</title>
		<link>http://www.masurlaw.com/3980/songs-and-records-two-types-of-music-copyrights/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>shaun bonilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masurlaw.com/?p=3980#comment-349</guid>
		<description>How do I obtain rights to play &quot;along the watchtower&quot; by jimi hendrix in an independent film with a low budget?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do I obtain rights to play &#8220;along the watchtower&#8221; by jimi hendrix in an independent film with a low budget?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple Sues HTC for Patent Infringement by Google Acquires Motorola Mobility &#124; MasurLaw</title>
		<link>http://www.masurlaw.com/4697/apple-patent-infringement/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Acquires Motorola Mobility &#124; MasurLaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 19:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masurlaw.com/?p=4697#comment-348</guid>
		<description>[...] lawyers have been busy with several suits against many Android handset makers including Samsung and most recently, HTC. As Page writes, “Our acquisition of Motorola will increase competition by strengthening [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lawyers have been busy with several suits against many Android handset makers including Samsung and most recently, HTC. As Page writes, “Our acquisition of Motorola will increase competition by strengthening [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Songs and Records: Two Types of Music Copyrights? by lowgen</title>
		<link>http://www.masurlaw.com/3980/songs-and-records-two-types-of-music-copyrights/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>lowgen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 12:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masurlaw.com/?p=3980#comment-347</guid>
		<description>&quot;These payment obligations are called “mechanicals.” The term refers to the mechanical manufacture of each new copy of the sound recording.&quot;


This is very wrong, isn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;These payment obligations are called “mechanicals.” The term refers to the mechanical manufacture of each new copy of the sound recording.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is very wrong, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

